07-13-2016, 10:28 AM
Ah, yes, this is so much more affordable than the Sigmas... 
But actually I was surprised: I had the price of the Nikon 17-55/2.8 in mind which still is quite steep. But the Canon only costs not even 100$ more than the Sigma 18-35.
I would not recommend the 20 or 24 on an APS-C body, both are big, the 20 very heavy and the 24 only heavy. And for stage, concerts or artistry, manual focus are something for people who like life extra difficult.
But actually I was surprised: I had the price of the Nikon 17-55/2.8 in mind which still is quite steep. But the Canon only costs not even 100$ more than the Sigma 18-35.I would not recommend the 20 or 24 on an APS-C body, both are big, the 20 very heavy and the 24 only heavy. And for stage, concerts or artistry, manual focus are something for people who like life extra difficult.