06-12-2016, 07:55 PM
If it has all the technology it needs, then why use Tamron's 15-30 and 24-70 and just rebrand it?
150-450 is something for APS-C in my opinion. The K-1 got some outstanding cool features with it. It's just a shame, Pentax keeps on repeating the behaviour to come too late to the show. They did it decades ago with their LX which was as well a pretty cool professional body with some great features - and the professionals stuck to their Nikons or Canons although Pentax' lens portfolio was quite huge and of good quality. Okay, that's old stories. To me it just looks like Pentax burns a lot of energy and money on a field the cannot win a noticeable market share.
But then, that's entirely not my business and if Die-hard-Pentaxians like you finally got the long awaited FF-body - cool. ^_^
150-450 is something for APS-C in my opinion. The K-1 got some outstanding cool features with it. It's just a shame, Pentax keeps on repeating the behaviour to come too late to the show. They did it decades ago with their LX which was as well a pretty cool professional body with some great features - and the professionals stuck to their Nikons or Canons although Pentax' lens portfolio was quite huge and of good quality. Okay, that's old stories. To me it just looks like Pentax burns a lot of energy and money on a field the cannot win a noticeable market share.
But then, that's entirely not my business and if Die-hard-Pentaxians like you finally got the long awaited FF-body - cool. ^_^