Smoke 'em if you got 'em. 
I don't have a horse in this race but the FE lineup looks more interesting with each quarter. However, I fully expect the audience (not here, mind you) to commence the bitching about these lenses being too large. Courtesy of the same people who were complaining about f/4 zooms being too slow.
P.S. I also sense an ultrawide coming at some point because this zoom trinity is not complete. However, for me it wouldn't be a big deal because a 16-35/4 and a stabilized 70-200/2.8 is what I use on Canon anyway.
Let's recap what we're missing in the lineup now:
- an ultrawide prime (below 25mm);
- an ultrafast normal prime (50mm f/1.4 or f/1.2);
- an inexpensive long telezoom (like 70-300/4-5.6 OIS);
- an expensive long telezoom (like 70-400/4-5.6 OIS);
- a 135 mm prime.
Any more ideas?
I don't have a horse in this race but the FE lineup looks more interesting with each quarter. However, I fully expect the audience (not here, mind you) to commence the bitching about these lenses being too large. Courtesy of the same people who were complaining about f/4 zooms being too slow.P.S. I also sense an ultrawide coming at some point because this zoom trinity is not complete.
However, for me it wouldn't be a big deal because a 16-35/4 and a stabilized 70-200/2.8 is what I use on Canon anyway.Let's recap what we're missing in the lineup now:
- an ultrawide prime (below 25mm);
- an ultrafast normal prime (50mm f/1.4 or f/1.2);
- an inexpensive long telezoom (like 70-300/4-5.6 OIS);
- an expensive long telezoom (like 70-400/4-5.6 OIS);
- a 135 mm prime.
Any more ideas?