12-17-2015, 07:52 AM
"Much better" is a bit of confusing term. As it shows much less field of view 
yet remains the same lens. If you cropped the 5D S testshots it would be the same, wouldn't it? I look forward to meet this guy buying that monster only for his APS-C camera. I think, there's a solid chance to crack the jackpot before. Twice. And the lens test you promised in 2013 in the verdict of the Sigma 35/1.4 Art
is still in the make? ^_^ I know, you're not responsible for the Nikon side of PZ
yet remains the same lens. If you cropped the 5D S testshots it would be the same, wouldn't it? I look forward to meet this guy buying that monster only for his APS-C camera. I think, there's a solid chance to crack the jackpot before. Twice. And the lens test you promised in 2013 in the verdict of the Sigma 35/1.4 ArtQuote:The lens remains a highly interesting beast for its high speed alone. However, if you don't plan to upgrade to a full-format camera anytime soon, you may also consider its cheaper cousin - the Sigma AF 30mm f/1.4 DC HSM | A - which is just as fast but more light-weight and, of course, more affordable. Soon to be seen in this theater as well (in Nikon mount at least). :-)
is still in the make? ^_^ I know, you're not responsible for the Nikon side of PZ