Posts: 1,340
Threads: 55
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
Is that a bad thing? Implicitly, why would it be better to be sensor limited than lens limited?
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
Posts: 442
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
I'm old school. Used to take landscape at F8 and get good depth of field and sharpness.
Soon we'll have to choose big depth of field <b>or</b> sharpness.
Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
25
Rover, I thought you had a Canon camera? Am I mistaken? I don't recall a 16mp model.