Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 USM L II
#4
Quote:It's app. 2.6 times more than the Sigma and depending to some special offers is the difference even higher. I also doubt the Sigma would be better and for sure the bokeh fringing is in a class of it's own, but the price tag is pretty massive given it's neither a spectacular focal length nor a breathtaking fast aperture. On the other side, for some people 35 mm is more of a "standard lens" than a nifty fifty. I'm still using my 35 mm quite often and sometimes only. And it's still cheaper than some Leica 35 mm... Smile
"nor a breathtaking fast aperture"???  :wacko: f/1.4 is as fast as it gets in FF land as far as 35mm focal length is concerned.  B) And f/1.4 is pretty darn fast any way you slice it.

Now, Klaus, all you need is to retest the other 35mm lenses to give you a frame of reference (35/1.4 L, 35/2 IS, Sigma 35/1.4 A... or even the old 35/2 for some comic relief).

  


Messages In This Thread
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 USM L II - by Rover - 12-01-2015, 12:08 PM
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 USM L II - by davidmanze - 12-26-2015, 01:49 AM
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 USM L II - by davidmanze - 12-26-2015, 11:57 AM
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 USM L II - by davidmanze - 12-27-2015, 04:32 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)