![]() |
Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Just Talk (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! (/showthread.php?tid=1602) Pages:
1
2
|
Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - marschiert bunt - 01-03-2014 There was also a fourth item announced, a new flash with guide number 58 and wireless control. Oh, btw: Do you still appreciate people providing lenses in the NX segment? I offered the 45mm "Pencake" some time ago, the messanger still says "not yet read". Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - Klaus - 01-04-2014 Markus is still soaked with work unfortunately. Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - arvydas - 01-04-2014 There are few pics taken with the new 16 - 50 f2.0 - 2.8 on flickr A. Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - Klaus - 01-05-2014 Inconclusive Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - arvydas - 01-05-2014 IMO it looks like any other fast standart zoom. 16mm f2.0 corner looks bad; triangular highlights at corners; center sharp enough but 50mm f2.8 seems softish. 3 stars? ![]() A. Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - Klaus - 01-05-2014 Given these photos I can't really tell anything about the corner performance. Samsung NX30, 16-50 f/2-2.8, 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 pancake! - mst - 01-05-2014 [quote name="marschiert bunt" post="25801" timestamp="1388781481"] marschiert bunt, on 03 Jan 2014 - 21:37, said: Do you still appreciate people providing lenses in the NX segment? I offered the 45mm "Pencake" some time ago, the messanger still says "not yet read".[/quote]Oops, sorry, my bad. I somehow really don't get along with the messenger feature of this board ![]() In general: yes, sure, thanks a lot. However, for now the NX reviews are at the very bottom of the pipeline, I'm afraid. And, as Klaus already hinted, I was involved in some time-intensive other projects, at the moment I'm trying to catch up to normal day-to-day business... spent the last two weeks doing the yearly tax stuff, for example. Anyway: I hope to have a little more time available for reviews towards spring. -- Markus |