New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Printable Version +- Opticallimits (https://forum.opticallimits.com) +-- Forum: Forums (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Canon EOS (https://forum.opticallimits.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III (/showthread.php?tid=652) Pages:
1
2
|
New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Brightcolours - 08-25-2016 The old (II): The new (III): Light green is aspherical lenses, dark green is UD glass. What does the total redesign bring? Apparently a lot. MTF of the old (II): MTF of the new (III): New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - JJ_SO - 08-25-2016 Sample pictures? Here we go: http://www.lens-rumors.com/canon-ef-16-35mm-f2-8l-iii-usm-lens-sample-images/ Impressive although no full size or at least bigger images are available. New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Klaus - 08-25-2016 So about as good as the f/4 L IS according to Canon. New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - toni-a - 08-25-2016 I am thinking about those who upgraded to 16-35 II and now they find themselves with an outdated lens. Couldn't canon engineers get this formula from the beginning? I know plenty of photographers who did the update and who will be updating now New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Brightcolours - 08-25-2016 The 16-35 f2.8 L USM II is from 2007, that is almost a decade ago. Lens design is constantly evolving. So the answer to your question? "No". New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Rover - 08-26-2016 The design does not look radically different though. It's an interesting fact that the 16-35/2.8 is the first L lens to go into the third iteration - kind of an admission by Canon that they didn't quite get the first redesign right somehow. BTW, I'm a happy camper with the f/4 IS. I know many people feel the same. A 16-35/2.8 was the default choice, but... Not anymore. Instead, it has become a niche lens (and the situation isn't helped by the very high price of this new unit). New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - borisbg - 08-26-2016 I wish Nikon redesign their 16-35 f4. New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - Rover - 08-26-2016 Quote:I wish Nikon redesign their 16-35 f4.Haha... Ken Rockwell was gushing about it but both PZ and Lenstip found it lacking. Ironically enough it was the originator of the stabilized 16-35/4 lens class but has been since outdone by Sony and especially Canon. Unfortunately, for now it looks a little too new to be updated so it may take them a while. New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - AN2 - 08-27-2016 http://www.canon.com.cn have full size sample photos. New Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM III - JJ_SO - 10-24-2016 "rush out and buy it", says Roger Cicala: Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L Mark III Optical Bench Tests ^_^ |