01-12-2012, 07:00 AM
[quote name='Sylvain' timestamp='1326320956' post='14769']
It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.
I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again.
[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.
the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.
[/quote]
These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.
It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.
I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again. [ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.
the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.
[/quote]
These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.