05-27-2012, 05:45 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-27-2012, 05:48 AM by nandadevieast.)
Hi,
Does someone can compare the Tamron 70-300 VC and Panasonic 100-300 for me?
What i want to know is how much better the 70-300 VC could be? Is it a huge difference? Or marginal?
regards,
PS: I have just bought OM-D and A-57
I already own 100-300 for OM-D (though it is lying with a friend at London and i will only get it in June <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />....
If Tamron is going to make substantial difference (200-300 range) then i can buy this for A57. If the difference is only subtle, then i can continue with 100-300.
Does someone can compare the Tamron 70-300 VC and Panasonic 100-300 for me?
What i want to know is how much better the 70-300 VC could be? Is it a huge difference? Or marginal?
regards,
PS: I have just bought OM-D and A-57
I already own 100-300 for OM-D (though it is lying with a friend at London and i will only get it in June <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />....If Tamron is going to make substantial difference (200-300 range) then i can buy this for A57. If the difference is only subtle, then i can continue with 100-300.