07-01-2010, 08:33 AM
If it is worth it, only you can answer. What do you expect the 40D to do what the 450D does not do?
You will lose a bit of functionality in the live view area (the 40D was the 1st Canon DSLR with "mainstream" live view, without contrast detect AF). You will lose a bit of resolution. And (not sure about this point) ISO in the view finder.
You gain a bigger view finder, weight, size, 2nd wheel on the back and in FPS.
What makes you look at the EOS 40D?
[quote name='marius' date='01 July 2010 - 09:16 AM' timestamp='1277972164' post='775']
Hi guys!
I know there are a lot of professionals between you, and I need your opinion.
Right now I own a Canon 450D and a Sigma 24-70. I love the lens (thanks to PZ). I want to updrage the body to 40D. Is it worth?
Danke!
[/quote]
You will lose a bit of functionality in the live view area (the 40D was the 1st Canon DSLR with "mainstream" live view, without contrast detect AF). You will lose a bit of resolution. And (not sure about this point) ISO in the view finder.
You gain a bigger view finder, weight, size, 2nd wheel on the back and in FPS.
What makes you look at the EOS 40D?
[quote name='marius' date='01 July 2010 - 09:16 AM' timestamp='1277972164' post='775']
Hi guys!
I know there are a lot of professionals between you, and I need your opinion.
Right now I own a Canon 450D and a Sigma 24-70. I love the lens (thanks to PZ). I want to updrage the body to 40D. Is it worth?
Danke!
[/quote]