[Klaus]

So they'll be f/2.8 ...

http://photorumors.com/2012/01/11/panasonic-ces-new-conversion-lenses-roadmap-concepts/



Which is fine for me at least.



58mm diameter so they seem to be fairly small.

[Sylvain]

It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.



I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again.

[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]

Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.



the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.

[Guest]

Nice. If it's indeed f/2.8 and that small, the 12-35mm might be the very first zoom lens for my Panny <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

[Klaus]

[quote name='Sylvain' timestamp='1326320956' post='14769']

It's still nothing official. Still the same platic mock ups but I think f/2 was unrealistic anyway.



I had made a dirty (loosely accurate <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />) comparison based on the mocks in the past, posted again.

[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]

Pink is 12-35 lens, then 14-42, then 14-45.



the 35-100 f/2.8 is very interesting I think.

[/quote]



These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.

[Sylvain]

[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1326351603' post='14783']

These prototypes are different. Last year they didn't show an imprinted aperture nor the filter diameter.

[/quote]



I'd think they're essentially the same with added switch & stickers. Nothing I'd call new.



And a better matching than mine there :

http://www.43rumors.com/real-images-of-the-12-35mm-and-35-10mm-fast-x-zooms/