09-25-2015, 11:10 PM
Quote:We should really get rid off these stupid LW/PH numbers.
With all due respect, I think it would help a lot to have the meaning of the resolution numbers better documented throughout the site.
But maybe the numbers could simply be represented as a fraction (or %) of sensor resolution? Instead of an absolute value (which is confusing people) they are a relative value tied to the sensor. For the EFM 22, the center value at f/2 would be tabulated as "3194/3450" instead of just "3194". (or "92.6%" of sensor resolution) This more clearly states the system relationship and reinforces the sensor's role.
I don't the like the Good/Very Good/Excellent system that was tried before.