Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM
#20
I prefer the absolute numbers myself. At the end of the day if a user (us viewers) can't understand that the value is a system result just tape a dunce sticker on them. I do releazie it it might cut down on the number of silly comments and inquiries so perhaps there is some benefit there to the site maintainer (you) so take this comment as my 2ct.

-

Why I like the values is that it represents a frame of reference for system peak performance and while 2000 vs 2100 might be effectively the same there is a difference between 500 and 5000 and that is useful information afterall we are buying more then a lens - we are buying a system.

Quote:We should really get rid off these stupid LW/PH numbers.
  


Messages In This Thread
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM - by scarlatti - 09-25-2015, 02:29 PM
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM - by Guest - 09-26-2015, 12:05 PM
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM - by Guest - 10-03-2015, 04:33 PM
next PZ lens test report: Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM - by Guest - 10-07-2015, 05:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)