[Brightcolours]

New 21mm f1.4, in normal and in cine guise:

http://www.syopt.com/en/product/photo-le...UMC-CS.php

http://www.syopt.com/en/product/cine-len...UMC-CS.php

 

New 50mm f1.2, in normal and in cine guise:

http://www.syopt.com/en/product/photo-le...UMC-CS.php

http://www.syopt.com/en/product/cine-len...UMC-CS.php

 

Seems to render pretty nicely, for a 50mm.

 

Both will be available for :

• EOS M mount
  
• Fuji X mount
  
• Sony E mount
  
• MFT mount
  

[Klaus]

The MTFs look awesome ....

[Rover]

MF!  :angry:

[Brightcolours]

MF!  :angry:

Haha, yep... That is what we get from Samyang, Zeiss and Voigtlander. Not suited for every need.

[borisbg]

I was looking at the link BC posted above and just realized that Samyang has good number of lenses to offer. And most of them perform quite good.

[Rover]

Haha, yep... That is what we get from Samyang, Zeiss and Voigtlander. Not suited for every need.

I know this is probably not going to change anytime soon... not in this universe. So that was just a futile squeal of indignation.

[toni-a]

Don't get overenthusiastic, today at a lens service who does most lens repairs in Lebanon including outsourcing canon lenses repairs, and I had a talk with the owner: They might be good brand new however they are very fragile, dropping a lens might mean losing the lens. He was mostly talking about the 8mm fisheye dunno if this applies to all their lineup. In Canon lineup a particularly fragile lens and prone to problems is Canon EFS 18-200 to be avoided: Frequent body failure, secondary decentering, elements migrating etc another one with frequent autofocus motor failure is canon 50mm f1.4. Failure is not related to superzooms canon 28-300 f3.5-5.6L is one of the most reliable lenses.

[youpii]

Nice but why not make it with electronic contacts like the Zeiss Loxia ?