Posts: 6,716
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Quote:Just curious if the 85L will perform better on the 5DS downsampled to 22mp compared to native 5D3?
Wide open of course
Has anybody done these tests? Hopefully Photozone will review this lens on 50mp as well soon 
I'm looking at every possible way to improve the image quality of my 85L
a look at the current 22mp MTF:
It shows us that the lens is pretty sharp wide open, in the center. This will mean that: yes, you will get more resolution in the 50mp file than in the 22mp file. The borders, probably not so much more resolution. But those generally are not that important wide open, since the DOF is small.
You of course will not get better IQ from the lens. However, you will get better IQ from the sensor, noise wise (The 5Ds has less intrusive pattern noise), and will be able to make bigger prints and stand up close and not see the individual pixels (but one normally doesn't stand up close to bigger prints). Why one would want to downsample to 22mp, I am not clear about. That seems a time-wasting exercise?
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 55
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
I presume the downsampling is to allow a comparison at the same pixel scale factor. I would expect some gain since it would partially negate the colour resolution loss in bayer pattern sensors.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
Posts: 4,031
Threads: 41
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
22
I don't see the benefit of taking pictures at 50 MP and downsample it to an amount your 5D3 already has. You lose all the resolution you paid pretty big bucks for and you gain no better noise than 5D3 already has, I assume (but I may be wrong assuming). Anyway, it's a good idea for sure to try it yourself.