Posts: 6,715
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
22
That Zeiss 35mm f1.4 seems to render very nicely, for its type.
Posts: 442
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
The primes have nice MTF. And the 28/2 is unusually complex for a "non G, non Zeiss" lens.
http://flickr.com/ephankim
Posts: 8,042
Threads: 1,865
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
Promising.
The super zoom will fail given its MTFs at 24mm though.
If the corners are already soso on an optical bench, they'll be bad when combined with an actual camera behind it.
The macro seems really yummy.
Posts: 442
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
Quote:
The macro seems really yummy.
15 lens elements, including OSS => centering nightmare
http://flickr.com/ephankim
Posts: 1,027
Threads: 188
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
7
I'm pretty curious on the performance of the 28 + the UWA adapter. Perhaps it's just my inexperience, but UWA adapter sounds as cheap solution. I presume Sony is offering something different here.
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
Posts: 442
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
http://flickr.com/ephankim