Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports
#8
Quote:Thanks for posting that, BC. Nikon 1 V2 appears surprisingly successful. So, their prices are justified a bit better, good to know.
Yeah, for tracking in good light it does very, very good.of course, I can't tell how much of an advantage it has DOF wise compared to for instance the 1D-X and D4 when judging in focus. But if you do not need such blurred backgrounds, it really does not matter.

 

By the way, they lenses they used:

  1. Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM II
  2. Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f2.8 VR II
  3. Nikon 1 Nikkor 10-100mm f4-5.6 VR
  4. Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 II
  5. Panasonic G X Vario 35-100mm f2.8 OIS
  6. Pentax DA* 50-135mm f2.8 SDM
  7. Sony 70-200mm f2.8 APO G SSM
  8. Sony E 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 OSS LE
  


Messages In This Thread
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Klaus - 05-25-2014, 10:15 PM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by borisbg - 05-26-2014, 01:56 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by popo - 05-26-2014, 07:51 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Klaus - 05-26-2014, 08:56 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Klaus - 05-26-2014, 08:57 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Brightcolours - 05-26-2014, 10:03 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2014, 10:09 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Brightcolours - 05-26-2014, 10:38 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2014, 11:09 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Guest - 05-26-2014, 01:16 PM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2014, 02:15 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)