Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports
#9
Well, with a 2.7× crop camera there's not much to be expected for blurred backgrounds. Maybe with adapted f/1.4 lenses, but then it's another question if the AF is precise and fast enough for them.

 

I'm just interested because a friend got a Sony ILCE 6000* to get some birds in flight. And she was mentioning the high burst rate of that camera. 20 fps of the Nikon are definitely higher and I was misinformed because I thought the 1 V3 is very expensive.

 

Now I rechecked and with the WiFi + touch-/swivelscreen + high burst rate + optional adapter to her Nikon lenses it's still no bargain, but affordable. I think, I need to ask her why she went for the Sony. Thanks for posting the lenses, too. I do have a bit of doubts if the camera is as fast with the optional Nikkor-adapter.

 

But now my attention is awake.

 

* just corrected NEX against ILCE

  


Messages In This Thread
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Klaus - 05-25-2014, 10:15 PM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by borisbg - 05-26-2014, 01:56 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by popo - 05-26-2014, 07:51 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Klaus - 05-26-2014, 08:56 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Klaus - 05-26-2014, 08:57 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Brightcolours - 05-26-2014, 10:03 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2014, 10:09 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Brightcolours - 05-26-2014, 10:38 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2014, 11:09 AM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by Guest - 05-26-2014, 01:16 PM
Mirrorless vs DSLR AF & sports - by JJ_SO - 05-26-2014, 02:15 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)