Posts: 214
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
Hi,
Maybe Marcus knows the answer...
Photozone found the 55-200 VR to be fantastic lens. But we don't have a 55-300 reviewed yet. If someone knows this, do the lenses have basically same performance from 55 to 200?
55-200: its amazing how well the lens did in the test.
regards,
ne
Posts: 214
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
05-13-2013, 02:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2013, 02:15 PM by nandadevieast.)
Hi,
this lens has all bars touching excellent at all focal lengths ?? :o
What is the reason? Am i missing something?
Is it because of 10MP?
70-300's which are expensive than this also don't have this kind of graph??
Used to have the 55-300mm (combined with D3000 – light package with long reach, excellent for hiking). Sharp enough, even at the long end. Ditched it eventually as it was awfully slow – resulted in huge number of missed / misfocused shots, especially those of moving objects <_<
Posts: 214
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
Markus, you better hurry up.
Everyone is waiting for 18-35 review.
Some are also waiting for 55-300 review, for a long time.
When you do the review, pls also compare it to 55-200 VR, on a 16mp sensor.
Posts: 8,004
Threads: 1,851
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
Please don't tell him to retest, please! There is so much new stuff our there.
Posts: 214
Threads: 24
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
Ha Ha...i think it was waiting to be done...
These lenses are bread and butter lenses of the masses...
![[Image: mtf.gif]](http://www.opticallimits.com/images/8Reviews/lenses/canon_70200_4is/mtf.gif)
