05-02-2013, 11:49 AM
I don't see the point in a mirroless A-mount only body. Pentax tried similar and it didn't go anywhere either. You don't really get a useful benefit from it.
Sony concentrating on E-mount makes sense to me, adapting to enable use of legacy A-mount equipment which will gradually die off. Of course we have the ongoing argument if E-mount can fully support FF, but I think it can be made to work if they wanted to. Bringing yet another new mount to the market is a step too far, unless they want to play in Leica territory.
Sony concentrating on E-mount makes sense to me, adapting to enable use of legacy A-mount equipment which will gradually die off. Of course we have the ongoing argument if E-mount can fully support FF, but I think it can be made to work if they wanted to. Bringing yet another new mount to the market is a step too far, unless they want to play in Leica territory.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.