01-11-2013, 04:26 PM
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1357677283' post='21331']In summary, I feel you could be a bit more welcoming, but that might just be my view.[/quote]
Hi Joachim, you may have point in this - I surely appreciate the efforts of PZ - it´s just that I have the strong feeling that they could do better without actually putting more time into this. Hence I´m not asking for more but just for a better concept to approach things. E.g. the MFT world is a bit in a unique position because two companies "natively" serve this format, Pana and Oly that is. What´s the point of reviewing the Pana 100-300 but ignoring the Oly 75-300? Likewise, when reviewing the Oly 40-150 why not doing the Pana 45-150 right next to it or at least shortly thereafter? In terms of helping with practical buying decisions MFT shooters need this kind of coverage probably more than a review of some high-flyers everybody has already agreed upon that they are excellent.
Best
Sammy
Hi Joachim, you may have point in this - I surely appreciate the efforts of PZ - it´s just that I have the strong feeling that they could do better without actually putting more time into this. Hence I´m not asking for more but just for a better concept to approach things. E.g. the MFT world is a bit in a unique position because two companies "natively" serve this format, Pana and Oly that is. What´s the point of reviewing the Pana 100-300 but ignoring the Oly 75-300? Likewise, when reviewing the Oly 40-150 why not doing the Pana 45-150 right next to it or at least shortly thereafter? In terms of helping with practical buying decisions MFT shooters need this kind of coverage probably more than a review of some high-flyers everybody has already agreed upon that they are excellent.
Best
Sammy