[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1357690153' post='21334']
As of now I haven't made up my mind how to proceed with Sony DSLRs. They seem to have lost momentum.
[/quote]
So, can it be that even the Sony FF section is out of question? Pity. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />/> There's quite a bit of ground not yet covered in that field (Easy Choice 85/2.8, 70-400G, 35/1.4, 50/1.4 (WTF really! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />/>), etc. I understand that the third party lenses are far more likely to be tested in Canon or Nikon mount (and certainly easier to procure) but the native ones have no such luxury.
Anyways, closer to home (that is, the Canon system) there's so much exciting new glass that it must be mindboggling for the tester (35/2 IS, Sigma 35/1.4 and 180/2.8 Macro, Tamron 90/2.8 VC and 70-200/2.8 VC, Tokina 17-35...)
As of now I haven't made up my mind how to proceed with Sony DSLRs. They seem to have lost momentum.
[/quote]
So, can it be that even the Sony FF section is out of question? Pity. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />/> There's quite a bit of ground not yet covered in that field (Easy Choice 85/2.8, 70-400G, 35/1.4, 50/1.4 (WTF really! <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />/>), etc. I understand that the third party lenses are far more likely to be tested in Canon or Nikon mount (and certainly easier to procure) but the native ones have no such luxury.Anyways, closer to home (that is, the Canon system) there's so much exciting new glass that it must be mindboggling for the tester (35/2 IS, Sigma 35/1.4 and 180/2.8 Macro, Tamron 90/2.8 VC and 70-200/2.8 VC, Tokina 17-35...)