[Klaus]

I just tested the Sony 30mm on the old NEX 5.





It's still a pretty crappy lens although not as bad as on the NEX 7 so I'm now sure that there's a negative border/corner effect on the 7. At max. aperture there even a higher absolute quality on the NEX 5 @ 14mp than on the NEX 7 @ 24mp.



Subjectively the 50/1.8 OSS doesn't seem to suffer as much but then it's shouldn't be as affected by the corner issues anyway.

[ficofico]

Klaus do you have the 50/1.8 OSS?



The effect it's only at extreme corner or not?

[marco]

Good news! ;-) So I will wait for an update, maybe next year, maybe longer.



Because of this fact the D400 could be deferred.

[Klaus]

[quote name='gianluca' timestamp='1330034665' post='16102']

Klaus do you have the 50/1.8 OSS?



The effect it's only at extreme corner or not?

[/quote]



Yes, I have the 50 OSS here.

The corners look better on the 7 here but that's only an observation at 100% mag on the display.

[ficofico]

I'm pretty sure 50 f1,8 oss it's good on the nex-7 corner because of this



http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8602032/e50/f5%2C6.jpg



I've download and developed this raw from here, no sharpenig but lightroom default setting



http://www.bmupix.com/journal/2012/2/20/...mages.html





What I want to know is if the corner effect of nex-7 it's visible only in the extreme corner or also for example in 2/3 of the frame or similar



Thank you klaus and I'm waiting for your 50 oss review here.

[Guest]

IR in their M9 review, used 30mm on Nex-7 in their comparison against M9 (using Summilux-M 50mm f/1.4)



http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/M9/M9A.HTM



Can you post all full-size images that you have taken with Nex-7 so far?

[soLong]

[quote name='Sathe Wild' timestamp='1330072430' post='16120']

IR in their M9 review, used 30mm on Nex-7 in their comparison against M9....

Can you post all full-size images that you have taken with Nex-7 so far?

[/quote]

....i like the way the 9's average price over there is $7920.99 - as if a cent makes a difference....must be precise though(although not so sure about that, looking further)...



....might i recommend that mst tests his 800 with only the best nikkors to avoid catching k's migraine

[mst]

[quote name='soLong' timestamp='1330084889' post='16126']

....might i recommend that mst tests his 800 with only the best nikkors to avoid catching k's migraine

[/quote]



Sorry to disappoint, but the D800 isn't even remotely tempting <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />



-- Markus

[Klaus]

[quote name='Sathe Wild' timestamp='1330072430' post='16120']

IR in their M9 review, used 30mm on Nex-7 in their comparison against M9 (using Summilux-M 50mm f/1.4)



[url="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/M9/M9A.HTM"]http://www.imaging-r...RODS/M9/M9A.HTM[/url]



Can you post all full-size images that you have taken with Nex-7 so far?

[/quote]



There will be some samples in the reviews.

[soLong]

[quote name='mst' timestamp='1330095019' post='16130']

Sorry to disappoint, but the D800 isn't even remotely tempting <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />

-- Markus

[/quote]

....24mp's are plenty for me :-) ..... sad though - a friend of mine would have been hoping that the first test might have been with the 70-300 @ f/8 (the only f/stop he uses with this lens)



.....and hmmmmm - said before, say it again - i rather liked Pz's camera tests, although it is possible to understand why you lot may not have cameras offered up for.... testing :-) ....still in any case, passing comments on acquisitions can often be enough - ta