Posts: 8,004
Threads: 1,851
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
Seem as if I found one. :-)
Shall be interesting. One complaint I've read about the nex-7 is that due to higher pixel density; it is more sensitive to bad technique (compared to the nex5n). I'm not too sure what to make of this complaint; it sounds like you can zoom in further and therefore shakes are more visible but the solution would be to limit your zoom factor to the same as the nex5n - no ?
anyscreenamewilldo
Unregistered
it would be surely interesting to have a look at the smaller za's on this camera
....and....
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1324994745' post='14143']
.....it sounds like you can zoom in further and therefore shakes are more visible but the solution would be to limit your zoom factor to the same as the nex5n - no ?
[/quote]
or use 1/1600th rather than 1/1250th (at 300)....or that's what it looks like to me on the 7d....but maybe for different reasons, and i could be wrong
Posts: 8,004
Threads: 1,851
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
[quote name='asnwd' timestamp='1325000048' post='14145']
it would be surely interesting to have a look at the smaller za's on this camera
....and....
or use 1/1600th rather than 1/1250th (at 300)....or that's what it looks like to me on the 7d....but maybe for different reasons, and i could be wrong
[/quote]
Yes, one of the first tests will be the Zeiss 16-80 via LA-EA2.
Will you be testing the 24f1.8 ?
Posts: 8,004
Threads: 1,851
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
49
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1325076653' post='14157']
Will you be testing the 24f1.8 ?
[/quote]
Well, eventually ... sure. All E-mount lenses will be (re-)tested.
' />
' /> even though my own camera is only 8 MP).
