Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
That new Leica 25/1.4 mFT
#1
A plastic Leica lens without a distance scale? That is funny. Some sites are speculating about prices in the range of 899 EUR. Even more funny.
#2
The Leica 45/2.8 is also a plastic lens (at an insane price).
#3
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1307956367' post='9168']

The Leica 45/2.8 is also a plastic lens (at an insane price).

[/quote]



"Certified with the name of world-renowned LEICA, the exceptional high image quality is guaranteed."





I reckon this confirms that these lenses are just branded but not designed by Leica.

Not that it matters if the quality is there but the premium pricing is a bit of a rip off.
#4
Well, I don't think there's generally anything wrong with plastic, since we're talking about a system that puts emphasis on light-weight. It always depends on the quality of the materials chosen, though.



And, honestly: when have you really needed a distance scale the last time? I certainly can live without one. Especially with non-landscape lenses.



However, I fully agree that the price is insane. We're talking about a 50/2.8 equivalent here.



I noticed that a hood has not been mentioned anywhere. Could it really be that it's not included?



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#5
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1307963129' post='9171']

Well, I don't think there's generally anything wrong with plastic, since we're talking about a system that puts emphasis on light-weight. It always depends on the quality of the materials chosen, though.



And, honestly: when have you really needed a distance scale the last time? I certainly can live without one. Especially with non-landscape lenses.

[/quote]

I fully agree. In fact, I was thinking for a moment that the combo 14/2.5 + 25/1.4 + 45/2.8 would be a nice complete lightweight kit for me.

It is just that this lens has nothing that would justify the price.
#6
Makes the voigtlander even more attractive, even though it is MF.
#7
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1307985490' post='9179']

Makes the voigtlander even more attractive, even though it is MF.

[/quote]



Most will prefer AF. I reckon the street price will be lower in the 720-770EUR range. Still not cheap though.

They will ultimately loose in the price battle with Sony if you ask me.
#8
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1307996052' post='9185']

Most will prefer AF. I reckon the street price will be lower in the 720-770EUR range. Still not cheap though.

They will ultimately loose in the price battle with Sony if you ask me.

[/quote]

Those dubious sites now talk about a 650 EUR initial street price for the Leica. Maybe Panasonic is playing the Sigma game. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='<_<' />

I guess Sony will also put a price premium on its upcoming 24/1.7 for the Zeiss name alone.
#9
[quote name='ThomasD' timestamp='1307966702' post='9172']

I fully agree. In fact, I was thinking for a moment that the combo 14/2.5 + 25/1.4 + 45/2.8 would be a nice complete lightweight kit for me.

It is just that this lens has nothing that would justify the price.

[/quote]



I think that price is not far from a Sony A850 (FF) + Minolta 24/2.8 + Minolta 50/1.4 + Tamron 90/2.8 Macro <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />
#10
[quote name='youpii' timestamp='1308000880' post='9189']

I think that price is not far from a Sony A850 (FF) + Minolta 24/2.8 + Minolta 50/1.4 + Tamron 90/2.8 Macro <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />

[/quote]

Although you only would need an 28mm f5.6, 50mm f2.8 and 90mm f5.6 to be comparable... Should be a pretty light setup too with such lenses.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)