05-28-2011, 06:50 AM
[quote name='fall' timestamp='1306538032' post='8862']
thanks for the reply puxavida. i was thinking of switching from canon to nikon, i was hoping to get some more info about these lenses before i sell my current setup, i dont have a nikon body yet to test these lenses on <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> . if the focus shift is that bad, i'd probably just stay with canon.
hopefully someone who had experience with these lenses can help me out.
[/quote]
Which lenses do you have now? And what camera do you have now?
A 24mm f1.4 seems to be a kind of strange choice for APS-C... Or rather, a D300s is a bit of a strange choice for the FF 24mm, which turns into a 35mm f2. A FF body with 35mm f2 lens would seem a more logical choice to most?
Same for the other lenses... 50mm f1.4 -> 85mm f1.8 is a good equivalent on FF, much cheaper too.
85mm f1.4 -> 135mm f2.
So... going full frame will be cheaper, as the lenses will be MUCH more affordable....
And why the change (any reason, even nonsensical ones, is fine... just curious, as the 7D does not really have to hide for the D300s)?
And it is not like the Canon lenses are worse either?
Anyway, those are my questions... why not going FF, as the lenses you list only really make sense on FF, and on FF you can get the same with way cheaper lenses for the same results...
thanks for the reply puxavida. i was thinking of switching from canon to nikon, i was hoping to get some more info about these lenses before i sell my current setup, i dont have a nikon body yet to test these lenses on <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> . if the focus shift is that bad, i'd probably just stay with canon. hopefully someone who had experience with these lenses can help me out.
[/quote]
Which lenses do you have now? And what camera do you have now?
A 24mm f1.4 seems to be a kind of strange choice for APS-C... Or rather, a D300s is a bit of a strange choice for the FF 24mm, which turns into a 35mm f2. A FF body with 35mm f2 lens would seem a more logical choice to most?
Same for the other lenses... 50mm f1.4 -> 85mm f1.8 is a good equivalent on FF, much cheaper too.
85mm f1.4 -> 135mm f2.
So... going full frame will be cheaper, as the lenses will be MUCH more affordable....
And why the change (any reason, even nonsensical ones, is fine... just curious, as the 7D does not really have to hide for the D300s)?
And it is not like the Canon lenses are worse either?
Anyway, those are my questions... why not going FF, as the lenses you list only really make sense on FF, and on FF you can get the same with way cheaper lenses for the same results...