Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
next PZ lens test report: Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5 L II
#1
Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url]
#2
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301609770' post='7261']

Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url]

[/quote]

As we all knew, it's a great lens.



The review would have also benefited from comment on how the lens compares to the TS-E 17, in terms of subject isolation, yes?



GTW
#3
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1301619593' post='7267']

As we all knew, it's a great lens.



The review would have also benefited from comment on how the lens compares to the TS-E 17, in terms of subject isolation, yes?



GTW

[/quote]



Why should we compare a 17mm vs 24mm lens in this respect ? Apples 'n Oranges - at least from my perspective.
#4
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301609770' post='7261']

Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url]

[/quote]



I think the figure legend for the tilt images should read horizontal and vertical tilt, not shift... right?
#5
[quote name='BG_Home' timestamp='1301640180' post='7274']

I think the figure legend for the tilt images should read horizontal and vertical tilt, not shift... right?

[/quote]



Right. Fixed.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#6
My next lens! Just three more months to wait.



Must... Be... Patient...



Must... Be... Patient...



Must... Be... Patient...
#7
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301609770' post='7261']

Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url]

[/quote]

Now, just make me a wide angle for APS-C that tilts and shifts! 35mm isn't wide enough <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' />
#8
[quote name='Alexander ' timestamp='1301741177' post='7319']

Now, just make me a wide angle for APS-C that tilts and shifts! 35mm isn't wide enough <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' />

[/quote]

They did <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' />

TS-E 17mm f4 L

17mm x 1.6 (Canon mount, so Canon APS-C crop factor) = 27.2mm <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />

Not made for APS-C, which is neat though, because it then can perform a double roll (27mm on APS-C and 17mm on FF 135 format).
#9
If only the MFT id**ts would design such specialty lenses <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Sad' />
#10
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1301745001' post='7320']

They did <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' />

TS-E 17mm f4 L

17mm x 1.6 (Canon mount, so Canon APS-C crop factor) = 27.2mm <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />

Not made for APS-C, which is neat though, because it then can perform a double roll (27mm on APS-C and 17mm on FF 135 format).

[/quote]

I forgot to write that I use Pentax <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' />
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)