Posts: 7,949
Threads: 1,829
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
Ahhh, some teasing again ... ;-)
Posts: 430
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
12-06-2010, 09:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2010, 09:14 PM by Rainer.)
The EF 70-300L has impressed you on APS-C !
Just a guess...Rainer
Posts: 7,949
Threads: 1,829
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
45
[quote name='Rainer' timestamp='1291670029' post='4797']
The EF 70-300L has impressed you on APS-C !
Just a guess...Rainer
[/quote]
I can see that white glow on the horizon but this one is actually black.
genotypewriter
Unregistered
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1291673680' post='4801']
Too long.
[/quote]
Since you said it's black... I looked at the Nikon lenses and saw you had given the 200 2 VR only 4.5 on average. So I can't see any other Nikon lens beating that. Maybe the Micro 200 f4 comes close but it's too long in the tooth to get such a rating I guess.
Which takes us back to Canon... and the only under-200mm L lens (i.e. prime... because I can't see any zooms getting 5 stars across the board) that you haven't reviewed (on FF) is the TS-E 24L II... and it's definitely worthy of 5 stars IMO.
GTW
Posts: 385
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
1
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1291673680' post='4801']
Too long.
[/quote]
Would 24mm be too long or too short?
' />
