08-04-2010, 12:05 PM
[quote name='Marco' timestamp='1280921347' post='1488']
But the 16 mm costs only 100 Euro if you buy it in the kit. For me it is only really bad in the extreme corners but mostly looks better than the LX3. I compare the NEX-5 with the LX3 because the are serving me for the same purpose.
[/quote]
Well, my personal opinion on this is that they shouldn't release such a lens if it does not perform according to its nature. A prime lens must have advantages over a zoom lens after all. Heck, Sony has released a wide-angle converter for it and I don't really want to imagine the performance level of this combo!
But the 16 mm costs only 100 Euro if you buy it in the kit. For me it is only really bad in the extreme corners but mostly looks better than the LX3. I compare the NEX-5 with the LX3 because the are serving me for the same purpose.
[/quote]
Well, my personal opinion on this is that they shouldn't release such a lens if it does not perform according to its nature. A prime lens must have advantages over a zoom lens after all. Heck, Sony has released a wide-angle converter for it and I don't really want to imagine the performance level of this combo!