02-13-2017, 06:10 AM
In times of the internet there're probably already more reviews then lenses out in the wild. 
Just google it, dozens of reviews around. But also one very good "counter review". It was linked also here in PZ. So I just copy the link out of a post which says basically "Hi. Link" Hi without a single typo, I wish I could say the same from my posts 
.
B) Edit: "just google AND verifiy it, JoJu", grrr :angry: . Sorry, all old stuff. At the least the phoblographer likes it, pheeww /Edit
It's just me - I would not invest money in something elder if the newer has some advantages over it. And in Tamron's case, I definitely would opt for the later version. While if I should decide amongst Nikon, I would refuse the decision, the pricing is just higher than the value I can recognize.
Just google it, dozens of reviews around. But also one very good "counter review". It was linked also here in PZ. So I just copy the link out of a post which says basically "Hi. Link" Hi without a single typo, I wish I could say the same from my posts .B) Edit: "just google AND verifiy it, JoJu", grrr :angry: . Sorry, all old stuff. At the least the phoblographer likes it, pheeww /Edit
It's just me - I would not invest money in something elder if the newer has some advantages over it. And in Tamron's case, I definitely would opt for the later version. While if I should decide amongst Nikon, I would refuse the decision, the pricing is just higher than the value I can recognize.