Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Kodak is back ... sort of
#4
That webpage is the dark side of modern marketing. Content without useful information.

 

I'm also assuming it is an android cameraphone, thicker to accommodate better optics and whatever else. Like all things we need more info on what it is and does, at what cost.

 

On the PZ facebook post on the same, it was asked why don't CaNikon do similar? I'd suspect in part because they'd have to partner with a phone manufacturer with all the problems that will bring, and the ROI would not be sufficient to justify it in their business model. This isn't a question of could they do it, but should they?

<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  


Messages In This Thread
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Klaus - 10-20-2016, 09:49 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Studor13 - 10-20-2016, 10:02 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Brightcolours - 10-20-2016, 10:09 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by popo - 10-20-2016, 10:25 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Klaus - 10-20-2016, 10:35 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Klaus - 10-20-2016, 10:37 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Brightcolours - 10-20-2016, 10:49 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Klaus - 10-20-2016, 11:08 AM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by obican - 10-20-2016, 12:10 PM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by Studor13 - 10-20-2016, 01:08 PM
Kodak is back ... sort of - by southerncross - 10-20-2016, 02:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)