The 100-400mm with 2x converter converter has a max theoretical resolution of around 5 megapixels at 800mm ...
I wonder who thought that this was a good idea.
They claim that these lenses have improved optics ... yet the MTFs are identical (of course). There's no way that there's no room for substantial improvements in these lenses.
Panasonic talked about smaller MFT cameras in interviews - and now this? And this price?
Do get that the development and production costs are basically identical to FF cameras, but I doubt consumers will accept the pricing.
If you are new in the market - why would you choose the G9 II over the S5 II? They even look identical.
I wonder who thought that this was a good idea.
They claim that these lenses have improved optics ... yet the MTFs are identical (of course). There's no way that there's no room for substantial improvements in these lenses.
Panasonic talked about smaller MFT cameras in interviews - and now this? And this price?
Do get that the development and production costs are basically identical to FF cameras, but I doubt consumers will accept the pricing.
If you are new in the market - why would you choose the G9 II over the S5 II? They even look identical.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji