Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Phillip Reeve bashed the Trioplan
#1
http://phillipreeve.net/blog/meyer-triop...w-sony-a7/

 

He has got some points which I agree upon... But the lens has got its merits indeed. 

 

stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
#2
What to expect from a decade old three elements lens ?

#3
Merits? From the review it's apparent that this lens sucks donkey rhino, to put it mildly.

#4
Quote:Merits? From the review it's apparent that this lens sucks donkey rhino, to put it mildly.
 

There are many excellent photos taken with the Trioplan... Just an example:

 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/luverne/se...255592370/
stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
#5
Quote:There are many excellent photos taken with the Trioplan... Just an example:

 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/luverne/se...255592370/
So far, so good... but I'm pretty sure that not much of the pictures' goodness comes from the lens itself. It's a combination of the photographer's clever work, light (which is indeed caught very well) and probably postprocessing, and technically these shots are made DESPITE the bad lens, not thanks to it.
#6
Quote:There are many excellent photos taken with the Trioplan... Just an example:

 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/luverne/se...255592370/
Many of those are photoshop composites rather than examples of what the lens produces....
#7
It's sort of funny ... the bokeh is so bad by common standards, that you may consider is to be interesting. ;-)
#8
Sure, a mirror lens also has its charm... For a grand total of 5 minutes.
#9
Quote:It's sort of funny ... the bokeh is so bad by common standards, that you may consider is to be interesting. ;-)
 

That's the point, indeed.

 

For what concerns Photoshop... I have a number of similar photo taken by me, even though not up to the quality of the Flickr gallery... I never used Photoshop (or else) to produce that look. I've only used it sometimes, as usual, to remove or reduce some distracting elements.
stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
#10
To be fair - as mentioned in the review the bokeh improves when stopping down.

The technical bokeh is never best at full open aperture - it's pretty much always better to stop down a little at least.

  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)