02-24-2016, 01:01 PM
I didn't feel attacked. I just think, the Sigma designers did some real good work off the beaten track. I also never used a Sigma DSLR, I'm only familiar with the dp-line. And sorry, I like their design, too. I was just teasing you with Canon because I also know people who don't like the curvy bodies with their plasticky surfaces. I know, the tough stuff is under the skin.
I thought it would be already clear that I don't debate the exotic way Sigma is going with their cameras. They are no mainstream and have a bunch of limits. I just think, we're sometimes not aware that each system brings it's limits because we're used to them.
Of course, one (always the same person) can say, they are years behind the pack. It's just, the pack isn't offering higher resolving EVF. 2.36 MP, for more one had to choose a Leica SL with 4 MP. PDAF and CDAF are also combined AF techniques for contemporary mirrorless and the DR can be delivered by an in-camera HDR feature (which probably will let the computer explode, calculating an HDR for 7×51 MP files...).
See my weakness for these SD quattro as some kind of mirrorlessmachismo B)
I thought it would be already clear that I don't debate the exotic way Sigma is going with their cameras. They are no mainstream and have a bunch of limits. I just think, we're sometimes not aware that each system brings it's limits because we're used to them.
Of course, one (always the same person) can say, they are years behind the pack. It's just, the pack isn't offering higher resolving EVF. 2.36 MP, for more one had to choose a Leica SL with 4 MP. PDAF and CDAF are also combined AF techniques for contemporary mirrorless and the DR can be delivered by an in-camera HDR feature (which probably will let the computer explode, calculating an HDR for 7×51 MP files...).
See my weakness for these SD quattro as some kind of mirrorlessmachismo B)