Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Panasonic GH2 reviewed - pretty good
#1
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicDMCGH2/



Looks like a great addition to the m4/3 world. Lens choices (for AF addicts) are still somewhat limited but the sensor and the EVF seem to represent real breakthrough achievements for this format.
#2
Looks really impressive. If I'd buy a small camera today that would be my pick. That is, assuming I could find one for sale....
#3
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1300954209' post='7060']

[url="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicDMCGH2/"]http://www.dpreview....anasonicDMCGH2/[/url]



Looks like a great addition to the m4/3 world. Lens choices (for AF addicts) are still somewhat limited but the sensor and the EVF seem to represent real breakthrough achievements for this format.

[/quote]



Yep. The only things they've to fix is their marketing (it's basically non-existing it seems) as well as product design (ugly as hell).
#4
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301125840' post='7099']

Yep. The only things they've to fix is their marketing (it's basically non-existing it seems) as well as product design (ugly as hell).[/quote]



Looks like a DSLR to me <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />



Anyhow, the GH2 would make a good basis for upcoming/planned/intended m4/3 lens tests?
#5
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301125840' post='7099']

Yep. The only things they've to fix is their marketing (it's basically non-existing it seems) as well as product design (ugly as hell).

[/quote]



Why would they need better marketing, if they can't satiesfy the demand which they face at present?



Considering the design, I think many of the recent Lumix system cameras (G1, G2, GH1, GH2 and also the proper 43rd L10) borough from the Leica R4 - R7 line. Sure if you don't like it you don't like it. There is nothing to argue.
enjoy
#6
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='1301146208' post='7106']

Why would they need better marketing, if they can't satiesfy the demand which they face at present?



Considering the design, I think many of the recent Lumix system cameras (G1, G2, GH1, GH2 and also the proper 43rd L10) borough from the Leica R4 - R7 line. Sure if you don't like it you don't like it. There is nothing to argue.

[/quote]

Are you sure about that?



The G1 toi GH2 and all models inbetween look like rather unremarkable SLRs in styling...



The GF series looks a bit like the Leica R4 to R7, yes.
#7
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1301160312' post='7113']

Are you sure about that?[/quote]



http://www.f8daily.com/Panasonic-Energy-...se-6669045
#8
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1301172563' post='7116']

http://www.f8daily.com/Panasonic-Energy-...se-6669045

[/quote]

The sure about that part was about the camera looks <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Wink' />
#9
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1301160312' post='7113']

Are you sure about that?



The G1 toi GH2 and all models inbetween look like rather unremarkable SLRs in styling...



The GF series looks a bit like the Leica R4 to R7, yes.

[/quote]



If you look at:



http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki...-front.jpg



and



http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/Panaso...s/3qtr.jpg



in particular the finder part. To me the curved section look quite similar and it is distinct from anything else I know. Obviously that is missing from the GF1, so I don't know how you want to argue a resemblance between the GF and the Leica R4.
enjoy
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)